| Document
|
Author Florin Dumitrascu |
| Abstract This study explored whether there were differences in workload and perceived usefulness between people who used an electronic checklist with sound for aeroplane landing and those who used a paper checklist. Two groups of University students were assigned to one of two conditions (A. paper checklist and B. electronic checklist with sound). Each group read their checklist (paper – group A, electronic checklist – group B) and selected cockpit areas on a screen to indicate completion of landing sub-tasks on an A320 aircraft. Workload and perceived usefulness were assessed subjectively. Those who used the electronic checklist stated lower levels of workload and found their checklist more useful than those who used the paper checklist. These findings suggest that electronic checklists with sound are a promising alternative to paper checklists used for landing, but further research is needed to fully understand their benefits for pilots. |
